Absolute oral bioavailability of almorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, in healthy human subjects.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this single-center, open-label study was to assess the absolute bioavailability of an oral (tablet) versus intravenous formulation of almorexant in healthy subjects. METHODS: A pilot phase in 3 healthy male subjects, which preceded the main study, consisted of a single 30-min intravenous infusion of 10 mg almorexant. Its objectives were to ensure the tolerability of the intravenous formulation and to select the intravenous dose for the main study. The main study was a randomized, two-way crossover study in 20 healthy subjects (10 males and 10 females). Subjects received a single oral dose of 200 mg almorexant and a single 30-min intravenous infusion of 20 mg almorexant. RESULTS: All 23 subjects completed the study as planned. Almorexant was well tolerated; the main observed adverse events were somnolence and fatigue. A geometric mean total body clearance of 43 l/h (95% CI 39-47) and a volume of distribution of 683 liters (95% CI 552-845) were determined. The absolute oral bioavailability of almorexant was 11.2% (90% CI 9.6-13.1). CONCLUSION: Almorexant seems to possess a pronounced first-pass effect and metabolism.

An investigation of the safety and pharmacokinetics of the novel TRPV1 antagonist XEN-D0501 in healthy subjects.

AIMS: XEN-D0501, a novel TRPV1 antagonist, is being developed to treat overactive bladder. This study investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics of repeat-dose XEN-D0501 in healthy subjects. METHODS: The study was conducted in two parts. Part 1 was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study in three cohorts of 12 young male subjects. Each subject received XEN-D0501 and placebo (in random order) twice daily for 13 days, with a final single dose on day 14. Doses of 1, 2.5 and 5 mg XEN-D0501 were investigated. Part 2 was an open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study in male and female subjects (45 to 65 years). Subjects received single doses of 5 mg XEN-D0501 under fasted and fed conditions in random order. Blood sampling and safety assessments were conducted throughout the study. RESULTS: XEN-D0501 was rapidly absorbed (t(max) generally 0.5-4 h post dose). XEN-D0501 exposure increased less than proportionally to dose over the range studied and exhibited minimal accumulation with twice daily dosing. Food had no clinically relevant effects on the pharmacokinetics of XEN-D0501. There were no severe or serious adverse events and all doses were well tolerated. A dose-related increase in body temperature was seen with XEN-D0501 which attenuated over time. Differences from placebo in mean maximum core body temperatures were 0.22°C, 0.5°C and 0.74°C following 1 mg, 2.5 mg and 5 mg twice daily XEN-D0501. The observed increase in body temperature was not considered to be of clinical concern. CONCLUSIONS: XEN-D0501 appeared safe and well tolerated at doses up to 5 mg twice daily for 14 days in healthy subjects.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single enantiomer (+)-mefloquine compared with racemic mefloquine in healthy persons.

Racemic mefloquine is a highly effective antimalarial whose clinical utility has been compromised by its association with neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal side effects. It is hypothesized that the cause of the side effects may reside in the (-) enantiomer. We sought to compare the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile of (+)-mefloquine with racemic mefloquine in a randomized, ascending-dose, double-blind, active and placebo-controlled, parallel cohort study in healthy male and female adult volunteers. Although differing in its manifestations, both study drugs displayed a substantially worse tolerability profile compared with placebo. The systemic clearance was slower for (-)-mefloquine than (+)-mefloquine. Thus, (+)-mefloquine has a different safety and tolerability profile compared with racemic mefloquine but its global safety profile is not superior and replacement of the currently used antimalarial drug with (+)-mefloquine is not warranted.

Pharmacokinetics of recombinant human growth hormone administered by cool.click 2, a new needle-free device, compared with subcutaneous administration using a conventional syringe and needle.

BACKGROUND: Growth hormone (GH) is used to treat growth hormone deficiency (GHD, adult and paediatric), short bowel syndrome in patients on a specialized diet, HIV-associated wasting and, in children, growth failure due to a number of disorders including Turner's syndrome and chronic renal failure, and in children born small for gestational age. Different brands and generic forms of recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) are approved for varying indications in different countries. New ways of administering GH are required because the use of a needle and syringe or a device where a patient still has to insert the needle manually into the skin on a daily basis can lead to low adherence and sub-optimal treatment outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the relative bioavailability of r-hGH (Saizen, Merck Serono) administered by a new needle-free device, cool.click 2, and a standard needle and syringe. METHODS: The study was performed with 38 healthy volunteers who underwent pituitary somatotrope cell down-regulation using somatostatin, according to a randomized, two-period, two-sequence crossover design. Following subcutaneous administration of r-hGH using cool.click 2 or needle and syringe, pharmacokinetic parameters were analysed by non-compartmental methods. Bioequivalence was assessed based on log-transformed AUC and C(max) values. RESULTS: The 90% confidence intervals for test/reference mean ratio of the plasma pharmacokinetic variables Cmax and AUC(0-inf) were 103.7-118.3 and 97.1-110.0, respectively, which is within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80-125%. r-hGH administered by cool.click 2 is, therefore, bioequivalent to administration by needle and syringe with respect to the rate and extent of GH exposure. Treatment using cool.click 2 was found to be well tolerated. With cool.click 2 the tmax was less (3.0 hours) than for needle and syringe delivery (4.5 hours), p = 0.002 (Friedman test), although this is unlikely to have any clinical implications. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that cool.click 2 delivers subcutaneous r-hGH exposure that is bioequivalent to the conventional mode of injection. The new device has the additional advantage of being needle-free, and should help to increase patient adherence and achieve good therapeutic outcomes from r-hGH treatment.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of atacicept in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: Atacicept, a recombinant fusion protein, blocks the activity of BLyS (a B-lymphocyte stimulator) and APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand) and may be a potential treatment for B-cell-mediated diseases. This study assesses the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of atacicept. METHODS: In this Phase I study, healthy male volunteers received a single subcutaneous dose of atacicept (2.1, 70, 210 or 630 mg) or placebo and were monitored over 7 weeks for injection-site pain, local tolerability, vital signs, echocardiography, haematology, coagulation, blood chemistry, serum virology, urinalysis and PK/PD markers [lymphocyte cell counts, BLyS-atacicept complex, immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM]. RESULTS: Atacicept was well tolerated at all doses (n = 23). There were no clinically significant changes in vital signs or laboratory parameters during the study. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were mainly mild or moderate in severity, and all were transient, resolving without any clinical sequelae. There was no evidence of any relationship between atacicept dose and the incidence of AEs. Local tolerability was good. Serum atacicept peaked 16 h after dosing, and the area under the concentration-time curve increased in an approximately dose-related manner. The 70-, 210- and 630-mg doses of atacicept demonstrated a dose-dependent biological effect on IgM levels, which was apparent up to 210 days post-dose. There were no treatment-related effects on IgG levels or lymphocyte subpopulations. CONCLUSIONS: These results showed that single subcutaneous doses of atacicept were well tolerated in healthy volunteers, demonstrated non-linear PK and were biologically active, according to IgM levels.